Search
Close this search box.

Choicelessness and Change

By 

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

In her excellent, confronting book Hospicing Modernity, Vanessa Machado de Oliveira suggests that we might only be able to change our way of living once we have no other choice. “There’s a popular saying in Brazil,” she writes, “that in a flood situation, it is only when the water reaches people’s hips that it becomes possible for them to swim. Before that, with the water at our ankles or knees, it is only possible to walk or wade.”

Commuters in Manila. Typhoon Fabian (July 21, 2021) © Avito C. Dalan via Wikimedia Commons

I want this to be wrong. I want to believe that humans can change our way of being before material circumstances make our old ways literally impossible, because the alternative is bleak: suffering must get substantially worse before large-scale change becomes thinkable. I would much prefer to think that well before we reach that point, we can see what’s happening, make common cause, and work for an equitable and life-giving future.

The evidence of the last few decades, however, suggests that Machado de Oliveira has hit upon a critical truth. Despite scientific consensus and widespread public concern about ecological breakdown, fossil fuel emissions and other harms have only accelerated. The dominant culture still believes in the myth of endless growth, the virtues of consumption, and the invincible sovereignty of the individual (particularly if that individual is white, wealthy, male-bodied, cisgendered, etc.). “People’s priorities are bound to the level of water around them,” she writes, and it’s hard to argue with her on this point. Large-scale change, it seems, is choiceless.

But what if there is something that the concerned-but-insufficiently-imperiled can do, besides depending on things to get worse? What if we could cultivate an awareness that makes upholding the status quo impossible? What if we could choose to have no choice but to change our way of living, as paradoxical as that sounds?

Animals reflexively avoid pain and discomfort, and humans are no exception: we flinch from touching a hot stove, and we hunch up against cold and blustery weather. Interestingly, this reflex can be learned: when our favorite meal gives us food poisoning, the mere thought of eating it again can make us feel sick. Once we know an action results in acute discomfort, avoiding that action becomes easy — choiceless, even.

One promise of the Dharma is that it can reveal the hidden mechanisms of harm. There is suffering, and that suffering has a cause we can discover. With practice and attention, we can gain a visceral understanding of how actions motivated by greed, hatred, and delusion can hurt. Once we have fully internalized that understanding, our revulsion for these poisons becomes reflexive.

It may be that our spiritual task is to nourish our discomfort until deep change becomes irresistible.

Can Dharma propel us, then, toward a rejection of destructive modernity? Can those of us who are not actively fighting for our lives nevertheless reach a point of psychic discomfort where radical transformation would be a relief, rather than an imposition?

These are not rhetorical questions. Obviously, spiritual practice cannot force the issue, not in the way that losing our house to a flood or our loved ones to a heat wave might. Yet it can support clear seeing. In my experience, Dharma can spark a positive feedback loop: even as it highlights discomfort, it offers the courage to face that discomfort. That courage can nourish intimate contact with the world, revealing new sources of discomfort. Perhaps sooner or later we reach a point where the choice is made for us — “business as usual” becomes intolerable.

If the water has not yet reached our hips, it may be that our spiritual task is to nourish our discomfort through practice and engagement until deep change becomes irresistible. I hope that One Earth Sangha can serve as a source of both provocation and possibility for all who are on this journey.

Tashi Black

Tashi Black

Tashi has been a Buddhist practitioner since 2015, and he spent 18 months as a temporary monastic at Gampo Abbey. His practice has helped him recognize the awesome magnitude of the ecological crisis, as well as its deep interpenetration with racial, gender, economic, and other forms of injustice. He is most interested in person-to-person transformation of ecological and social consciousness, as well as the great spiritual potential of this radically uncertain time. He began volunteering with One Earth Sangha in 2018 and served as Assistant Director until 2024.
Share this EcoDharma
facebook
twitter
email

Related

EcoDharma
EcoDharma

Vows, Resolutions, and Right Resolve

In a culture that in some ways wants us to feel inadequate, it's worth examining how we relate to our resolutions.
EcoDharma
EcoDharma
Anam Thubten Rinpoche shares a call for us to see the sacred in every facet of our world.
Practice
Practice
In celebration of the life of monastic and scholar Khenchen Thrangu Rinpoche, we share this practice he composed in response to global warming and ecosystem collapse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.