Close this search box.

We Are All Related

Training for Insights into Imperfection, Impermanence, and Relatedness


Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Through his teachings, the Buddha issues a profound challenge: he invites us to see the implicit views we project upon ourselves and the whole of reality. This inquiry into view, its distortions, and its relationship to systems of oppression, is from a talk given by Bonnie Duran as part of the 2017 EcoSattva Training. The transcript below has been lightly edited for clarity.

Apache Copper - Inside Wall of Open Pit Copper Mine © J Henry Fair — Used with permission.

I want to talk a little bit about one of my very favorite Buddhist suttas, the Vipallasa Sutta—it’s part of the Anguttara Nikaya—and wrong view. This is the whole sutta:

Sensing no change in the changing,
Sensing pleasure in suffering,
Assuming “self” where there’s no self,
Sensing the un-lovely as lovely —

Gone astray with wrong views, beings
Mis-perceive with distorted minds.

Bound in the bondage of Mara,
Those people are far from safety.
They’re beings that go on flowing:
Going again from death to birth.

But when in the world of darkness
Buddhas arise to make things bright,
They present this profound teaching
Which brings suffering to an end.

When those with wisdom have heard this,
They recuperate their right mind:

They see change in what is changing,
Suffering where there’s suffering,
“Non-self” in what is without self,
They see the un-lovely as such.

By this acceptance of right view,
They overcome all suffering.

I love that sutta. To briefly review it, the four Vipallasas are distortions very much like the three characteristics of reality that we know. If we’re not seeing the three characteristics of reality as we walk around our life, we have distortions of perception, thought, and view; our understanding of the world is distorted. We hold the impermanent as permanent. We trust that things that are unsatisfactory, that all these conditioned things somehow are going to bring us some lasting satisfaction. We grasp at things as if we as people ourselves are permanent. And we don’t really understand the nature of beauty.

These are the three levels of the Vipallasas: distortions of perception, thought, and view. I think this is very much tied to a classic organization development idea from Peter Senge and Chris Argyris, who actually have Buddhist underpinnings to their approach. In this Ladder of Inference, we select data, then we filter the data based on our views, and we affix meaning to things and conceptual overlays, when reality really is not a bunch of concepts. Reality is beyond concepts, from what I have understood. We come to a conclusion about the way things are and these beliefs become hardened views, ditthi vipallasas. Then based on that, we determine what to even experience in our environment.

One way to understand how these are formulated is through this matrix of power: control of economy—as a mixed-race native person, that’s the social location that I see it from—land appropriation, labor exploitation; control of natural resources; control of authority through government and normative institutions like the army; control of gender and sexuality, family, and education; and control of subjectivity, which is really the most insidious one. As a college professor, I can see that we think our subjectivity explains the world, and that’s what people in power think. They believe that they have the right subjectivity, and if everyone else wasn’t stupid, they would think the same way as them. Which is definitely avidya. It’s ignorance.

One of the things that this worldview has led to is epistemicide, the killing of other ways of knowing. This is an emerging important perspective or theoretical view in higher education right now. This, for example, is what Western science and Western medicine have tried to do; the intention was to kill off native indigenous ways of knowing and indigenous healing systems.

This video was made by a brilliant student of mine, Nate Trig, who made this as part of his final class assignment.

This is an example of some of the ways of life or epistemologies, ways of knowing, ways of holding the world that are different, that have an opportunity to actually save the planet. Bolivia and Ecuador, both indigenous countries with a predominant population of indigenous peoples, are examples of an indigenous epistemology or a way of knowing relationship. A few years ago in the Bolivian constitution they actually gave the same rights to Pachamama, to nature, that humans have—the right to life and to exist, to continue vital cycles without alteration. The water has a right to be pure and clean. The air has a right not to be polluted. These are examples of ways of knowing and ways of relationship to the natural world that have been killed off by predominant Western ways of knowing.

The water has a right to be pure and clean. The air has a right not to be polluted.

From a perspective of distortions of perception, thought and view, there are perceptions that are among us humans: that men might think they need to be in charge, or that European peoples and their descendants were more valuable than others, and that nature is a commodity for pleasure and convenience. The thoughts that those perceptions might give rise to are that we need more oil production for my use and everything should be privatized for efficiency—that whole idea of neoliberalism that is part of what’s happening right now in this country and globally. I think the Buddha was right—it is all situated in ignorance, greed, aversion and delusion. The Vipallasas at that level are: accumulation equals happiness, myself is most important, and colonization of the sacred through commodification.

This is just one way to think about and to organize what’s happening to us, as aspects of nature and the threat that’s before us right now.

What is one of the ways to free ourselves? Sati, mindfulness. Satipatthana is an actual source of uprooting these delusions. Mindfulness—hold things between privilege and intolerance. It opens to the suffering and realizes the common humanity that, as my dear friend Ruth King says, nothing is ever perfect, personal, or permanent. We can reflect on what the Buddha said and everything in our lives—it’s not perfect, it’s not personal, and it’s not permanent.

Bonnie Duran

Bonnie Duran

Bonnie Duran is a core-teacher of the IMS Teacher Training Program, the SRMC Dedicated Practitioners Program and is on the SRMC Guiding Teachers Council. Bonnie teaches long and short retreats at IMS, Spirit Rock and in other communities, and is also involved in Native American spiritual practices and traditions. She is a contributor to Hilda Gutiérrez Baldoquin book, Dharma, Color and Culture: New Voices in Western Buddhism and has written for the Harvard Divinity Bulletin, Tricycle, and the Turning Wheel. Dr. Duran is a professor in the schools of social work and public health at the University of Washington. She is also on the leadership team at the Indigenous Wellness Research Institute. She has worked in public health research, evaluation and education among Tribes, Native Organizations and other communities of color for more than 35 years.
Share this EcoDharma


For the cultivation of our own responsivity, Mark takes us on a guided journey outward into rich ecosystems and inward to the natural reverberations of our hearts.

Foundations of One Earth Sangha

One Earth Sangha exists in part to evolve and share EcoDharma. But how do we define EcoDharma, what does it emphasize, and why do we consider this part of our mission?
The grief of the world can feel overwhelming. But what if opening to and expressing this grief can free us to respond authentically to the suffering all around us?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.